FOXTEAM UAV CLAN

a Virtual Robotix Network Team

What kind of Design do you prefer for your next drone ?

After one year of first experiment with 3d fast prototyping frame , we try to choose a new design for the next step ,  help us to choose better : 

Some upgrade to proposal (B) :

Original design Proposal (0)

 

 

We start to evaluate next step and start to promote to our customers and our community new  design ... 

These are first proposal , reply to this blog post with your prefered design help us to choose better: 

 

First proposal (A):

 

Second proposal (B):

 

 

Third proposal (C):

 

 

 

If you want to propose some upgrade or different kind of approach  write your suggestions ... 

This is only first selection ... to be continued ...

by a young italian designer :  Carlo Ceruti  a www.virtualrobotix.com project :)

Best 

Roberto Navoni

 

Views: 1096

Comment

You need to be a member of FOXTEAM UAV CLAN to add comments!

Join FOXTEAM UAV CLAN

Comment by Guillaume Helle on March 13, 2013 at 11:00am

I like the version B too...

As Oyvind i think the top cover must be transparent to have a look on leds (board, xbee,..)

An interesting design too is the quad for "Protezione civile" : it seems very pratical, waterproof and has a good look!

Comment by Roberto Navoni on March 8, 2013 at 10:49pm

Hi Guys ,

today we had a long meeting about Option 'B' design ... we evaluate some upgrade . Monday will be available online . Thanks a lot for your support and suggestions .... We are consider in our review .

We are doing evaluation not only on design , but also of electronic position , possibility of payload , trasmitter , battery , time of flight ecc ecc .... 

Comment by Alexander Voronov on March 8, 2013 at 7:12pm

I'm sorry for my opinion, but none of variants is a AVIO device looks like :(

Dream to see working constrution set, showing us the force fild in loaded elements, kinds of different materials used, modules funtionality showing.

and there are'nt scale factors, so nobody can say what is real size (large or small)/

Thanx all for reading ;)

Comment by STEFAN CENKOV on March 8, 2013 at 12:33pm

Design B seems very practical and at the same time has futuristic shape, like me.

Comment by Oyvind Amundsen on March 8, 2013 at 10:47am

Option B :-) and make the top cover balck transparent, so it is possible to see status LED's on the controller, GPS, radio..

Comment by Sergio Molino on March 7, 2013 at 9:14pm

B proposal

I think that it is a good stating point for a nice modern quadricopter.

Need a verification on the possibility to build at competitive price.

Comment by Ivan Alessio on March 7, 2013 at 8:41pm
B solution has a very original design!
Comment by YURI on March 7, 2013 at 8:17pm

La soluzione B sembra più interessante ed impegnativa, adatta a una struttura minimale con una fusoliera appena sufficiente a contenere l'elettronica e la batteria.

Scaricando le forze dei motori agli estremi della fusoliera bisogna calibrare accuratamente la struttura per ridurre i pesi.

Comment by Parke @ ParkeFlyer on March 7, 2013 at 5:36pm

I meant A & C  are nice, but evolutionary.

Comment by Parke @ ParkeFlyer on March 7, 2013 at 5:35pm

I too like B. I love the idea of having the safety ring supported by the main body and not the arms. It is also a defining design where A & B are nice, but evolutionary.

Events

© 2019   Created by Roberto Navoni.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service